NAMIT PANDEY ALIAS NAMIT KUMAR PANDEY ALIAS PUNPUN PANDEY ALIAS NAMIT PANDY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./5232/2025 · 2025-09-10
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24592 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24592 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:27585] -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5232 of 2025
Namit Pandey @ Namit Kumar Pandey @ Punpun Pandey @ Namit Pandy, Aged about 34 years, Son of Braj Kishore Pandey, Resident of H. No. 519, Dumardaga, Sainik Colony, Booty More, P.O. Buti, P.S Sadar, District Ranchi.
..... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
..... … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anupam Anand, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ------
03/ 10.09.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 65 of 2019, registered for the offences under Sections 379, 411 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement of the apprehended co-accused and two of the co-accused has already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. Nos. 5019 of 2019 and 2793 of 2024 by the co-ordinate bench. He further submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-22 of the petition.
4.
Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submit that the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement of the apprehended co-accused.
[2025:JHHC:27585] -2-
5.
Considering that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-22 of the petition and further two of the co-accused, who are driver and owner of the vehicles in question have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.As. and from the impugned
order, it transpires that the petitioner has received the notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on the appropriate terms and conditions or on sureties as may deem fit and proper by the learned Court.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-