[2025:RJ-JP:35217] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9104/2025 1. Vikashsingh S/o Prahlad, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Sawasa, Police Station Manpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City, District Ka- rauli) 2. Lokesh S/o Dharamsingh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mariyada, Police Station Manpur, District Dausa, Ra- jasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City, District Karauli) 3. Ajeet S/o Bharatlal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Pancholi, Police Station Manpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City, District Ka- rauli) 4. Manoj @ Jhandu S/o Rajendra @ Ghugharya, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Pancholi, Police Station Manpur, District Dausa, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hin- daun City, District Karauli) 5. Lakhansingh S/o Hargovind, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Chirawada, Police Station Gadhmora, District Karauli, Ra- jasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City, District Karauli) 6. Smt. Laxma W/o Sardar, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Gopalpur Tan Gudhachandraji, Police Station Nadoti, Dis- trict Karauli, Rajasthan. (Confined In Sewar Jail Bharat- pur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Rinesh Gupta For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan [2025:RJ-JP:35217] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9104/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.296/2023 registered at Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 447, 354, 379 & 506 of IPC. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that essentially, there is land dispute between the parties. Counsel submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties. It is submitted that vide order dated 16.03.2023, trial Court directed the complainant party to furnish bonds so as to maintain peace, despite this, they tried to take possession of the land in question which as per the commissioner report, is in possession of the petitioners. Counsel submits that other co- accused namely Pukhraj, Smt. Kavita, Smt. Surjya, Dinesh, Ramkhiladi, Sardar, Satveer, Mahendra Singh & Tej Singh have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as co- ordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. They submits that petitioners are duly [2025:RJ-JP:35217] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9104/2025] named in the FIR and they actively participated in commission of crime. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the fact that cross-cases have been registered between the parties; aforesaid co-accused have been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as co-ordinate Bench of this Court; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners -(1) Vikashsingh S/o Prahlad, (2) Lokesh S/o Dharamsingh, (3) Ajeet S/o Bharatlal, (4) Manoj @ Jhandu S/o Rajendra @ Ghugharya, (5) Lakhansingh S/o Hargovind & (6) Smt. Laxma W/o Sardar shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:35217] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9104/2025] 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /99