IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.42 of 2024 Date of Decision: 04.06.2025 _______________________________________________________ Dinesh Kumar & Ors. …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State. Mr. Navdeep Singh, Additional Superintendent of Police, Shimla, present in person. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 04.06.2025, issued under the signatures of Deputy Secretary (Home) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, has been decided to be complied subject to outcome of an Appeal, which is to be filed by the department before Hon’ble Apex Court and on completion of all other codal formalities. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Having taken note of aforesaid compliance, there appears to be no justification to keep the present petition alive and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that needful, in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, shall be positively done within four weeks, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge June 04, 2025 (sunil)