Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24587 (CHH)

KANHAIYALAL NISHAD v. SMT. KAMLA BAI NISHAD

CRR/768/2019 · 2025-06-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:28605 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 768 of 2019 Kanhaiyalal Nishad S/o Late Milau Ram Nishad Aged About 58 Years (Now Aged About 60 Years), Head Constable Batch No.311, Through Superintendent Of Police, R/o Rajeev Nagar, Lakholi Ward No. 31, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Kamla Bai Nishad W/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Nishad Aged About 45 Years (Now Aged About 47 Years), Occupation House Wife, R/o Rajeev Nagar, Lakholi, Ward No.31, Police Station Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ku. Deepa Nishad D/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Nishad Aged About 23 Years (Now Aged About 25 Years), Occupation Student, R/o Rajeev Nagar, Lakholi, Ward No.31, Police Station Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ku. Rakhi Nishad D/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Nishad Aged About 20 Years (Now Aged About 22 Years), Occupation Student, R/o Rajeev Nagar, Lakholi, Ward No.31, Police Station Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 4 - Trilok Nishad S/o D/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Nishad Aged About 17 Years (Now Aged About 19 Years) Occupation Self Earning Member, R/o Rajeev Nagar, Lakholi, Ward No.31, Police Station Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Petitioner : None. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 27.06.2025 1. The present revision has been filed by the applicant with following prayer: “ It is, therefore most respectfully prayed in the interest of justice equity and good conscience that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for record of learned Family Court for perusal examination and verification under Hon'ble Court's revisional jurisdiction and may further be RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 pleased to allow revision setting-aside the impugned order dated 08-05-2019 (Annexure A-1) as passed in favour of present non-applicant No.2 to 4, in the interest of justice. ” 2. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the applicant to press this revision when the case is called out. 3. It appears that the applicant has lost his interest to pursue this matter. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone. 5. Registrar (Judicial) of this Court is directed to send a certified copy of this order as well as the original records to the concerned trial Court within a week for necessary compliance and follow up action, if any. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar