I.ii= ^4` FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE YI LAKSHMANA Between.. CRIMINALPETITIONNO.-7188OF2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA I ii= 1. Vennapusa sudhakar Reddy, s/o.Ranga Reddy, Hl'ndu, aged about 52 years, Agrjculturist, r/o.Elchuru vI-IIage, santhamaguluru Mandai Prakasam Distrl-ct 2. Avula Sanjeeva Reddy, , s/o.Koti Reddy, Hindu, aged about 35 years. cultI'VatjOn I/o.Dr.No. 13-4-69/126, SrI-niVaSa Nagar, Kotappakonda Road Narasaraopet Town, Guntur Distr,-ct i 3. Sikhakollj veeranjaneyuluu S/o.China venkateswarlu Hindu, aged 65 years, business, r/o.Dr.No.7-8-45/3, Atchaivari veedhi, srI|ramPuram Narasaraopet Town, Guntur DistrI-Ct 4. Maruri Ramalinga Reddy, , s/o.Kotilinga Reddy, Hl'ndu, aged about 52 years, business r/o.Dr.No.12-9-ll/14, Prakash Nagar, Narasaraopet Town,Guntur District. Petitioner/Accused No.2 to 5 AND The state ofAndhra pradesh, Through SHO Nasaraopet " Town p.s.,rep by publI-C Prosecutor High Court ofAndhra pradesh, at Amaravati Respondent/complainane petition under sections 482 of BNSS (old 438 of Cr.P.C), prayI-ng that in` the circumstances stated in the affidavl't filed I-n support of the crI'mjnai petition, the High Court may be pleased to dI-reCt the respondent to enlarg6 the petitioners/Accused No.2 to 5 on ba" in the event of theI'r arrest in connection with the case jn crime No.53/2025 of Narasaraopet H Town p.s. +`1r The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed I'n Support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of srf HABIBULLA SHAIK, Advocate for the petI-tiOnerS and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the fo!Iow[-ng,I APHCO10347802025 LEELF: lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (special original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHIVIANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7188/2025 [3521] Between: vennapusa sudhakar Reddy and Others .I.PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh counsel for the petitioner/accused(S): 1,HABIBULLA SHAIK ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT counsel for the Respondent/cOmPlainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: -The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity [the BNSS]) by the petitioners for granting of pre-arrest ba" in connection with crime No.53 of 2025 of Narasaraopet ll Town Police Station, Palnadu District, I =$9 ..-..,-` registered for the alleged offences Punishable under 318(4), 316(2), 119(1) I/w.3(5) of of the Bharatiya Nyaya SanhI-ta, 2023 (for brevI-ty [th\ BNS)). 2. 2. The case of the prosecution js that the defacto complainant and the accused were engaged in real estate business and in the course of their business transactions, accused cheated the defacto complainan{ and misappropriated the amounts. on 17.05.2025 at about o6.00 PM., when the complajnant went to the house of Accused No.1 and requested him for amount, Accused Nos.1 and 2 kicked him on his chest, due {o whl-ch he fell on the ground[ Basing on the report of the complainant, a case was registered against the petitI'OnerS/accused. 3. Sri Habibulla Shaik, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not committed any offence,- they were falsely implicated Ion this Case,I they are ready to abide any conditions to be I'mPOSed by thl-s Court; and urged to grant pre-arrest ba" to the petitioners. 4. Per confra, Ms. P.Akhila NaI-du, the learned Assistant public prosecutor, opposed in granting of ba" stating that investigation I-s not yet completed; I'f the petitioners were granted pre-arrest baj], they would repeat the same offence and urged to dl'smI-SS the bail petition. 5. Perusedtherecord. `-~ h~`. ) -I-6. As seen from the FIR lodged by the defaCtO COmPlainant there_e`r?~_`` civil disputes pending between the defacto complainant and Accused ` _`` _ - No.1. The alleged inc'lden{ Of beating the defaCtO COmPla-lnant by Accused No.1 and the Petitioner No.1 occurred on 17.05.2025 at about o6.00 PM, whereas the typed written report Was lodged by the defaCtO complainant on 19.05.2025. As much, there was a delay Of two (02) _'_..--_.--_-`--- days in lodging the compla-lnt which Was not COnV'lnCingly explained. 7. ln view of the nature Of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the alleged role played by the Petitioners in this Case and the civil disputes pending in between the petitioners and the defacto -\ --' ` complainant, this court deems it fit to grant pre arrest bail to the petitioners/accused. 8. ln the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed With the following conditions: i. ln the event of their arrest, the petitioners/Accused shall be enlarged on bail subject to their executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, With two Sureties for the like Sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials; ii. The petitioners/Accused shall make themselves available for investigation as and when required; j-'3a=.® ..~1 `. ill-. Thepetltloners/Accusedsha" not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecutl'on witnesses; iv. The petitioners/Accused shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned once I-n a Week i.e., on every Saturday between 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., till fill-ng Of the charge sheet. v. The petI-{iOnerS/Accused shall not leave the district limI'tS Without the express permI-SSiOn from the Station House Officer concerned. //TRUE COPY// Sd/-G.HELANAIDU i - ASSISTANT RE AFR SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Narasaraopet 2. The Xlll Additional District and Sessions Judge: Narasaraopet 3. The Stat'lon House Officer, Narasaraopet ll Town P.S. 4. One CC to SRl. HABIBULLA SHAIK Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT] 6. One spare copy KJ I/I _.a ~HIGH COURT DR.YLRJ DATED:18/07/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.7188 of 2025 ALLOWED ty..=.` w. +-'`````- #de\.-