Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19098 RSA No. 657 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 657 OF 2016 (DEC) BETWEEN:
1. RAMACHANDRAIAH S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
2. MARANNA S/O KAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
3. CHIKKAKAVALLAPPA S/O RAYANNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
4. DODDAIAH S/O RAYANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS, R/O GATLAGOLLAHALLI, BUKKAPATNA POST, C.N. DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 129 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GANGADHARAPPA A V., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19098 RSA No. 657 of 2016
AND:
1. RANGAPPA S/O BALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
2. GOPALAPPA S/O BALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
3. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O BALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
4.
BYRAPPA @ BYRANNA S/O BALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS, R/O GATLAGOLLAHALLI, BUKKAPATNA POST, C.N. DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 129 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V JAVAHAR BABU, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2 & ALSO FOR R1 & R3 SRI. CHANDRAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.12.2015 PASSED IN RA.NO.5005/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE 4th ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MADHUGIRI ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19098 RSA No. 657 of 2016
28.02.2015 PASSED IN OS.NO.14/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADHUGIRI.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal.
2. It is stated that due to intervention of elders and well-wishers in the village, appellants and respondents have amicably settled the dispute.
3. Appellants No.1 to 4 filed an affidavit reiterating the averments made in the memo.
4. In view of the amicable settlement, the appellants submit that appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19098 RSA No. 657 of 2016
5. The memo along with the affidavit filed by the appellants No.1 to 4 is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
BVK