Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24583 (AP)

BIDARLA SYED BASHA v. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER

WP/17593/2025 · 2025-07-14

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010347412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 17593/2025 Between: 1. BIDARLA SYED BASHA, SON OF SRI BIDARLA MAHABOOB SAHEB, 13-574-4, K.V.REDDY NAGAR, TADIPATRI-515 411, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, YADIKI, TADIPATRI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, YADIKI, TADIPATRI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction, directing the 1ST Respondent to effect mutation of the Petitioners name with respect to Ac.0.80 cents of land in Survey No.914D/2 in Yadiki Village, for which, the Petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of ever since the date of purchase vide Sale Deed No. 160 of 2006 dated 18.2.2006 and Sale Deed No. 1154 of 2007, dated 11.7.2007 and pass su 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction to the 1ST Respondents provide details and documentary evidence which form the basis for the alleged relinquishment of land of Ac 0.76 cents in Survey No.914 D/1 in Yadiki Village, Tadipatri Mandal, Ananthapur District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, as otherwise the Petitioner will be put to severe loss and hardship Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KARTHIK RAMANA PUTTAMREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: Ms. Kiranmai, learned counsel representing Sri Karthik Ramana Puttamreddy, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through online seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 15.07.2025 SNI 3 143 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.17593 OF 2025 Dated: 15.07.2025 SNI