IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 16096 OF 2018 Between: 1. Kakarla Mallikarjuna S/o. Kakarla Pullaiah, Aged- 70 Years, Occ; Cultivation, R/o. Kristapadu (v), Peddvaduguru (M), Anantapur District Anantapur. 2. Kakarla Rangaiah, S/o. Kakarla Ramanaidu, Aged- 42 Years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o Kristapadu (v), Peddvaduguru (M), Anantapur District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District Guntur. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Pamidi Circle, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 4. The Station House Officer, Peddavaduguru Police Station. Anantapur, Anantapur District. 5. Chavva Lakshmi Narayana Reddy, S/o. Chavva Adhinarayana Reddy Age- 60 years, Occ; Business, R/o 7/1, Near Chandana Gate, Rayalacheruvu (v) Yadiki (m), Anantapur District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents 3 and 4 in calling Petitioners to police station with a demand to sell Petitioners Agricabure Lands in survey numbers 433-1,434, 435, 445-3, 446-3, 447-2 633, 634-2 1250-R, 1250-Q, 1250-F situated in Kristapadu (v) A. Peddavadugur (M), Anantapur District to Respondent no.5 herein as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to not to put pressure on the Petitioners for executing any conveyance deeds in favor of Respondent no.5 with respect to Agriculture Lands in survey numbers 433-1, 434, 435, 445-3, 446-3, 447-2, 633, 634-2 1250-R, Q, 1250-F, situated in Kristapadu (v), Peddavadugur (M), Anantapur District. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to not to interfere with the legal activities of the petitioner by calling him to police station, pending disposal of the writ petition before thislHon^le court. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI N. CHANDRA SHEKHAR REDDY I Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010347842018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 16096/2018 Between: 1.K. MALLIKARJUNA, KAKARLA MALLIKARJUNA S/0 AGED- 70 YRS KAKARLA CULTIVATION, R/0 KRISTAPADU (V), PEDDVADUGURU (M), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ANANTAPUR PULLAIAH OCC- 2. KAKARLA RANGAIAH, S/0 KAKARLA RAMANAIDU, AGED- 42 YRS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/0 KRISTAPADU (V), PEDDVADUGURU (M), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND I.GTATE OF A P REP PRL SECY DEPT OF HOME, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT GUNTUR. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAMIDI CIRCLE ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDDAVADUGURU POLICE STATION. ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2 i 5.CHAWA LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY, S/0 CHAWA AGE- 60 YEARS, OCC- R/0 7/1, NEAR CHANDANA GATE, YADIKI (M), ANANTAPUR ADHINARAYANA REDDY, BUSINESS RAYALACHERUVU (V) DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME(AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO.16096 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief; “....to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents 3 and 4 in calling Petitioners to police station with a demand to sell Petitioners Agriculture Lands in survey numbers 433-1, 434, 435, 445-3, 446-3, 447-2, 633, 634-2 1250-R, 1250-Q, 1250-F, situated in Kristapadu (v), Peddavadugur (M), Anantapur District to Respondent no. 5 herein as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to not to put pressure on the Petitioners for executing any conveyance deeds in favor of Respondent no. 5 with respect to Agriculture Lands in survey numbers 433-1, 434, 435, 445-3, 446-3, 447-2, 633, 634-2 1250-R, 1250-Q, 1250-F, situated in Kristapadu (v), Peddavadugur (M), Anantapur District and to pass... ” Sri N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner 2. appeared through V.C. and would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in 3. attendance. s».. 4 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending i this Writ Petition shall stand closed. in Sd/-V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I y\.- To, SECTION OFFICER 1. OneCCto Sri N. Chandra Sekhar 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, 3. Three C.D. Copies. Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:23/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.16096 of 2018 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS