APHC010347752024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: 1. GODE PRASANTHI,, D/O. LATE SANKARA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 34 OPP- VEGETABLE MARKET, BOBBILI. 1. GODE ANASUYAMMA, W/O, LATE SANKARA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, MARKET, BOBBILI. 2. KORADA SATYAVATHI, W/O. THAVITI RAJU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, KORADA STREET, SRIKAKULAM. 3. VARANASI KRISHNA VENI, W/O. VARMA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, ANNMAYYA ENCLAVE, BHEL HYDERABAD. 4. JAMI DHANALAKSHMI, (DIED) 5. GODE KUSUMA KUMARI, (DIED) 6. VARANASI RADHA, W/O. SESHAGIRI RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NIJAMPETA ROAD, HYDERABAD. 7. POTNURU BHARATHI, W/O. CHANDRA SHEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. NEAR PETROL BUNK, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 8. N JYOTHI, W/O. MALLESH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, C/O. GADE IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1814/2024 GODE PRASANTHI,, D/O. LATE SANKARA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 34-275, PEDDA BAZAR, VEGETABLE MARKET, BOBBILI. ...PETITIONER AND GODE ANASUYAMMA, W/O, LATE SANKARA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, RESIDING AT OPPOSITE TO VEGETABLE MARKET, BOBBILI. KORADA SATYAVATHI, W/O. THAVITI RAJU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, KORADA STREET, SRIKAKULAM. VARANASI KRISHNA VENI, W/O. VARMA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, ANNMAYYA ENCLAVE, BHEL HYDERABAD. LAKSHMI, (DIED) GODE KUSUMA KUMARI, (DIED) VARANASI RADHA, W/O. SESHAGIRI RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NIJAMPETA ROAD, HYDERABAD. POTNURU BHARATHI, W/O. CHANDRA SHEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. NEAR PETROL BUNK, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. N JYOTHI, W/O. MALLESH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, C/O. GADE IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA GODE PRASANTHI,, D/O. LATE SANKARA NARAYANA, AGED 275, PEDDA BAZAR, ...PETITIONER GODE ANASUYAMMA, W/O, LATE SANKARA NARAYANA, AGED RESIDING AT OPPOSITE TO VEGETABLE KORADA SATYAVATHI, W/O. THAVITI RAJU, AGED ABOUT 74 VARANASI KRISHNA VENI, W/O. VARMA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, ANNMAYYA ENCLAVE, BHEL HYDERABAD. VARANASI RADHA, W/O. SESHAGIRI RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 POTNURU BHARATHI, W/O. CHANDRA SHEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. NEAR PETROL BUNK, GOPALAPATNAM, N JYOTHI, W/O. MALLESH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, C/O. GADE 2 ANASUYA, OPP- VYSYA BHAVAN, MAIN ROAD, BOBBILI. 9. GODE KASI VENKATA DHARMA RAJU GUPTA, S/O. LATE SANKARA NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OPP- VEGETABLE MARKET, BOBBILI. 10. JAMI RANGARAO, S/O. TRINADHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, THOTAPALAM, ARASAVALLI VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM. 11. JAMI UDAY KUMAR, S/O. RANAGARAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, THOTAPALAM, ARASAVALLI VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM. 12. JAMI VINAY SAGAR, S/O. RANAGARAO, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, THOTAPALAM, ARASAVALLI VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe above named Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of grounds in Civil Revision Petition having been aggrieved by the Order and Decree dt 10.05.2024 in I.A.No. 225 of 2024 in O.S.No. 38 of 2018 in the court of the II Additional District Judge, Parvathipuram for the following grounds among other IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay of suit in O.S.No. 38 of 2018 in the court of the II Additional District Judge at Parvathipuram pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1814 of 2024 ORDER: When the matter is taken up today for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that he submitted a letter dated 12.08.2025 before the Registry, requesting to withdraw the present revision petition since the disputes are being settled out of Court and his client no longer wishes to continue the litigation. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 22.08.2025 MDP