SRI ANKUR CHUTIA @ GHANASHYAM CHUTIA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Bail Appln./3904/2025 · 2025-12-15
Pranjal Das
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24577 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24577 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010267212025
2025:GAU-AS:17419
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3904/2025 SRI ANKUR CHUTIA @ GHANASHYAM CHUTIA S/O- SRI BOGADHOR CHUTIA. R/O- LAHUWAL GAON, P.O.- CHAHARIKATA, P.S.- MORAN, DIST.- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP. ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K GOGOI, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
O R D E R
16.12.2025
Heard Mr. P.K. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State respondent. Page No.# 2/3
2. This application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused/petitioner, namely, Ankur Chutia @ Ghanashyam Chutia, praying for grant of bail in connection with Sessions Case No.261/2025 pending before the Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh in connection with Moran P.S. Case No.98/2025 U/S 118(2) with added Section 103(1) of BNS, 2023 in correspondence with G.R No.959/2025. 3. The allegation in the FIR is about the petitioner assaulting the brother of the informant and injuring him with a sharp weapon. It appears that subsequently the victim expired whereupon section 302 IPC was also added. The petitioner was stated to have been arrested on 10.09.2025. Investigation is completed in the case by way of a charge-sheet and the case is presently, at the stage of consideration of charge. 4. The learned Addl. P.P. objected to the grant of bail at this stage. 5. With the regard to the petitioner side, the learned prosecution submits that the statutory notices required to be given at the time of arrest were duly given. However, considering the length of detention and the fact that the case is poised for commencement of trial, I am of the considered view that - subject to suitable conditions, the petitioner can be enlarged on bail. 6. Accordingly. the accused person is hereby allowed to go on bail of Rs. 30,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court and subject to the following conditions that:- (i) That the accused person shall be available for the trial, (ii) That the accused person shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. (iii) That the accused person shall not in any manner intimidate harass or harm the informant and or any witnesses. Page No.# 3/3
7.
Violation of any bail conditions will entail cancellation of the bail. 8. This bail application stands allowed and disposed of. 9. Send back the case diary. JUDGE
Comparing Assistant