Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24576 (KAR)

B.N. SUBRAMANI, v. SRI. B.K. MANJUNATH,

RFA/1114/2023 · 2025-02-04

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5047 RFA No. 1114 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1114 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN: B.N.SUBRAMANI, S/O B.K.NATARAJA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT REAR PORTION OF PROPERTY, NO.66, OLD NO.23, EAST ANJANAYA TEMPLE STREET, BASAVANGUDI, BENGALURU-560 004. …APPELLANT (BY SRI.CYRIL PRASAD PAIS., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. B.K.MANJUNATH, S/O B.N.KRISHNAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO. 66/4, (OLD NO.23), EAST ANJANAYA TEMPLE, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560 004. …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5047 RFA No. 1114 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Smt.Laveena D'Souza., counsel on behalf of Sri.Cyril Prasad Pais., for the appellant appeared in person and seeks time to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is plain. The appeal was listed before the Registrar (P and H) on 12.06.2023, on that day, three weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P and H) on 27.10.2023, on that day, at request by counsel for the appellant time was granted till 4 p.m., to comply with the office objections. However, office objections were not complied with. Hence, the office was directed to list the appeal before the Court on 08.11.2023. The appeal was listed before the Court on 08.11.2023 and two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. The appeal is listed today for compliance of office objections. It's almost one year, the office objections are not complied with. Despite the grant of time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellant is not - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5047 RFA No. 1114 of 2023 interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7