Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24575 (MAD)

DR.ENBASEKARAN MUTHUR RAMAN v. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

WP/5249/2025 · 2025-02-25

M S Ramesh, N Senthilkumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.5249 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.02.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR W.P.No.5249 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.5826 & 5827 of 2025 Enbasekaran Mathur Raman ...Petitioner Vs. 1. The Assistant Director Directorate Of Enforcement, Government Of India, Chennai Zonal Office-1, BSNL Administrative Buildings, Old No.7, New No.2, Kush Kuamr Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 2.Deputy Superintendent Of Police Detachment, Vigilance And Anti Corruption, Alandur, Chennai-600 106. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned communication issued by the 1st respondent vide Summon No.PMLA/ SUMMON / CEZO-I/ 2025/ 1973, dated 22.01.2025 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5249 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.Naveen Kumar Murthi For S.Varsha For Respondents : Mr.N.Ramesh Special Public Prosecutor (ED) ORDER (Order of this Court was made by M.S.RAMESH.J,) The prayer in the Writ Petition is to quash the summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate, calling upon the petitioner herein to appear before them on 18.02.2025. 2. When the Writ Petition was taken up for hearing on 14.02.2025, we had recorded the submissions of the petitioner that though he has challenged the summons, he is willing to appear before the authorities and accordingly, we gave liberty to the petitioner to appear before the authorities. 3. Today, the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondents would submit that in consequence to the order passed on 14.02.2025, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5249 of 2025 petitioner had appeared before the authorities. 4. The submission of the learned Special Public Prosecutor is hereby recorded. Since the hearing date in the impugned summons has lapsed, no effective orders require to be passed in the present Writ Petition. It is needless to point out that in case the petitioner is intends to challenge the entire proceedings, if permissible, it is always open to him to challenge the same in the manner known to law. 5. In the light of the above, this Writ Petition stands closed accordingly. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [M.S.R., J] [N.S., J] 25.02.2025 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Anu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5249 of 2025 M.S.RAMESH, J. and N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. Anu To 1. The Assistant Director Directorate Of Enforcement, Government Of India, Chennai Zonal Office-1, BSNL Administrative Buildings, Old No.7, New No.2, Kush Kuamr Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 2.Deputy Superintendent Of Police Detachment, Vigilance And Anti Corruption, Alandur, Chennai-600 106. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. W.P.No.5249 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.5826 & 5827 of 2025 25.02.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis