-1- 2025:CGHC:24970 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4630 of 2018 Balkrishan S/o S/o Late Lakheshwar Kashyap Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Akola, Police Station Than Khamaria, At Present R/o Village Dhamdha, Tahsil And Police Station Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1- State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mahandi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Tahsildar Bemetara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Hiran @ Parvati Kashyap So Called W/o W/o Late Lakheshwar Kashyap R/o Village Akola, Police Station Than Khamaria, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Lomas @ Loknath S/o S/o Lakheshwar Kashyap R/o Village Akola, Police Station Than Khamaria, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh., District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Agrima Pandey, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer For Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 17.06.2025 Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- 1) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby setting-aside/quashing the impugned order dated 30.04.2018 (Annexure P/1). 10.2 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 2) Mr. Kotecha would submit that the petitioner has already moved application under the provisions of Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act before the learned competent Civil Court and same is pending consideration; thus, he would submit that this writ petition has become infructuous. 3) At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to revive it at an appropriate stage. 4) Not opposed by the other side. 5) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM