105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Suresh Kumar State of Haryana & Ors CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Ms. Navroop Jawanda, Legal Aid counsel for the petitione Ms. Tanushree Gupta, D TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed, directing the respondents as part-time Lecturer in Sanskrit in the fourth respondent 2. It is apparent terminated vide order dated 28.02.2000, Annexure R the post having been abolished by the Government had not increased as expected. As pe termination letter Since the petitioner has not challenged the order of termination, the relief claimed cannot be granted. 3. Accordingly, the petition 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of May 15, 2025 ps IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16272-2000 Date of Decision :15.05.2025 Versus f Haryana & Ors HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA s. Navroop Jawanda, Legal Aid counsel for the petitione Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed, inter alia, directing the respondents to re-induct the petitioner in service who was working time Lecturer in Sanskrit in the fourth respondent It is apparent from the record that the petitioner’s service was terminated vide order dated 28.02.2000, Annexure R the post having been abolished by the Government had not increased as expected. As per endorsement termination letter was received by the petitioner but he refused to sign Since the petitioner has not challenged the order of termination, the relief claimed cannot be granted. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of May 15, 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision :15.05.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA s. Navroop Jawanda, Legal Aid counsel for the petitioner. eputy Advocate General, Haryana. inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus induct the petitioner in service who was working time Lecturer in Sanskrit in the fourth respondent-School. record that the petitioner’s service was terminated vide order dated 28.02.2000, Annexure R-4/2. It was on account of the post having been abolished by the Government as the strength of students r endorsement dated 28.02.2000, the was received by the petitioner but he refused to sign the same. Since the petitioner has not challenged the order of termination, the relief ands dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No mandamus induct the petitioner in service who was working record that the petitioner’s service was It was on account of the strength of students he . Since the petitioner has not challenged the order of termination, the relief TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.05.16 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document