[2025:RJ-JP:29585] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10632/2025 Kailai Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Samiti Limited, Situated At Village Kailai, Namner, District Dausa, Rajasthan- 303508, Through Its Secretary, Dhara Singh Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Kailai, Namner, District Dausa, Rajasthan - 303508. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nehru Sahakar Bhavan, Bhavani Singh Road, 22 Godam Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Jaipur Diary, Near Gandhi Nagar, Railway Station, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Near Gandhi Nagar Railway Station, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Neel For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 01/08/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that by passing the impugned order dated 30.06.2025 the respondent No.3 directed for shifting the dairy of the petitioner elsewhere. Counsel submits that the aforesaid order was passed without issuing any notice or without providing any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Counsel submits that the respondent No.3 did not have any jurisdiction to pass the same as per Section 55 of the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 2001. [2025:RJ-JP:29585] (2 of 2) [CW-10632/2025] 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 3. A perusal of the recod indicates that the order dated 30.06.2025 has been passed against the petitioner without issuing any notice or without providing any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, by the respondent No.3. 4. It is a settled proposition of law that before passing any adverse order against a person at least one opportunity of hearing is required to be given but in the instant case, neither any notice nor any opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner and straightway the impugned order has been passed which has resulted in violation of the principle of natural justice. 5. Considering the above, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the respondent No.3 for redressal of his grievances. In case such application is submitted by the petitioner within a period of one week from today it is expected from the respondent No.3 to pass appropriate order within a period of three weeks thereafter. 6. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 7. For a period of four weeks, the order dated 30.06.2025 shall not be given any affect. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/23