APHC010347242003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. L.VENKATESWARAIAH ACHARI, S/O L.PULLAYA ACHARI, R/O. SRISAILAM PROJECT, B/40 EASTERN COLONY. 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER AP GENCO LTD, A.P.GENCO LTD., VIDYUTH SOUDA, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER OM, SRISAILAM 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SRISAILAM PROJECT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ. Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus i) to set aside the Memo dt.9/1/1997 of the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and beyond the scopes of the respondents along with the Memo dt.4/3/2002 of the 1 petitioner eligible for promotion as U.D.C. from 6/5/2002 the date of passing 6 accountancy test. iii) to call for records. in the interest of justice and equity. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 8383 OF 2003 Petition under Section 1 in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner herein for the post IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6427/2003 L.VENKATESWARAIAH ACHARI, S/O L.PULLAYA ACHARI, R/O. SRISAILAM PROJECT, B/40 EASTERN COLONY. ...PETITIONER AND THE GENERAL MANAGER AP GENCO LTD, A.P.GENCO LTD., VIDYUTH SOUDA, HYDERABAD. THE CHIEF ENGINEER OM, SRISAILAM PROJECT. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SRISAILAM PROJECT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be appropriate Writ. Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus i) to set aside the Memo dt.9/1/1997 of the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and beyond the scopes of the respondents along with the Memo dt.4/3/2002 of the 1st respondent. ii) to declare the petitioner eligible for promotion as U.D.C. from 6/5/2002 the date of passing 6 accountancy test. iii) to call for records. in the interest of justice and equity. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 8383 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner herein for the post IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI L.VENKATESWARAIAH ACHARI, S/O L.PULLAYA ACHARI, R/O. ...PETITIONER THE GENERAL MANAGER AP GENCO LTD, A.P.GENCO LTD., THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SRISAILAM PROJECT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be appropriate Writ. Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus i) to set aside the Memo dt.9/1/1997 of the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and beyond the scopes of the respondents st respondent. ii) to declare the petitioner eligible for promotion as U.D.C. from 6/5/2002 the date of passing 6 accountancy test. iii) to call for records. in the interest of justice and equity. 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner herein for the post 2 of U.D.C. by 6 suspending the Memo dt.9/1/1997 and Memo dt.4/3/2003 pending disposal of the W.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R ANNAPURNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. (SC FORT SFC ZONE IV) M VIDYA SAGAR 3 The Court made the following order: Smt R.Annapurna, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 11.09.2025 MP 4 160 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6427 OF 2003 Dated: 11.09.2025 MP 5