Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24565 (PAT)

Ramanand Tudu v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/1168/2024 · 2025-07-16

Nawneet Kumar Pandey

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1168 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2022 Thana- SC/ST District- Araria ====================================================== Ramanand Tudu SON OF LATE CHOTELAL TUDU RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARWAHA WARD NO. 01, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar BIHAR 2. BIRESH YADAV SON OF KISHAN YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARWAHA WARD NO. 09, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 3. NARESH YADAV SON OF KISHAN YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARWAHA WARD NO. 09, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 4. KISHAN YADAV NA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARWAHA WARD NO. 09, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 5. SINGHESHWAR YADAV SON OF BACCHU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NARPATGANJ REWAHI WARD NO. 10, PS- NARPATGANJ, DIST- ARARIA ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Md. Ziaul Quamar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 5 16-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the State. 2. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 10-10-2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Araria by which, the learned court below though took cognizance in this case against opposite party Nos. 4 & 6 but the court below having found no material against opposite party Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 & 7, exonerated them from the case. 3. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1168 of 2024(5) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 the cognizance has been taken by the learned court below against two accused persons; (1) Parmeshwar Yadav and (2) Ramesh Yadav since the witnesses have taken their names. The names of respondents No. 1, 2, 3, 5 & 7 were not found place in the statement of witnesses and that is why, they have been exonerated from the array of the accused. 4. I do not find any error in the impugned order and accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed. A.K.V.//- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T