Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1168 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2022 Thana- SC/ST District- Araria ====================================================== Ramanand Tudu SON OF LATE CHOTELAL TUDU RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARWAHA WARD NO. 01, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA ... ... Appellant/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar BIHAR
2.
BIRESH YADAV SON OF KISHAN YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARWAHA WARD NO. 09, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA
3.
NARESH YADAV SON OF KISHAN YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARWAHA WARD NO. 09, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA
4.
KISHAN YADAV NA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARWAHA WARD NO.
09, PS- FORBESGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA
5.
SINGHESHWAR YADAV SON OF BACCHU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NARPATGANJ REWAHI WARD NO. 10, PS- NARPATGANJ, DIST- ARARIA ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Md. Ziaul Quamar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 5 16-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the State.
2. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 10-10-2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Araria by which, the learned court below though took cognizance in this case against opposite party Nos. 4 & 6 but the court below having found no material against opposite party Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 & 7, exonerated them from the case.
3. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1168 of 2024(5) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 the cognizance has been taken by the learned court below against two accused persons; (1) Parmeshwar Yadav and (2) Ramesh Yadav since the witnesses have taken their names. The names of respondents No. 1, 2, 3, 5 & 7 were not found place in the statement of witnesses and that is why, they have been exonerated from the array of the accused.
4. I do not find any error in the impugned order and accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed.
A.K.V.//- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T