APHC010347592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17622/2025 Between: 1. SUNKARA SOWMYA, W/O. SUNKARA MADHU BABU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 15/182, PEDDABESTA STREET, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), STATE SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), STATE SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE JOINT DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT 7. THE TAHSILDHAR, VALLUR MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VALLUR POLICE STATION, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SINGARAJU MAHASWETHA VARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent 7 in not considering the representation, dated 29.06.2025 made by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondent 8 to take cognizance of the complaint/report lodged by me dated 29.06.2025 and to register an F.I.R. and further investigate into the matter in the interest of justice.” 2. Ms.S.Maha Swetha Varma, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that Respondent No.7 is not considering the representation of the Petitioner. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent No.7 is directed to consider the representation of the Petitioner and take appropriate action according to governing rules and law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.07.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17622 of 2025 Dt.17.07.2025 Dinesh