Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24558 (KAR)

SSA CONSTRUCTIONS v. ANDHRA BANK

WP/15178/2015 · 2025-01-08

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:648 WP No. 15178 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 15178 OF 2015 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SSA CONSTRUCTIONS, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI G.GOPALA REDDY, S/O VENKU RADDY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O NO.1408, 11TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, WOC ROAD, BANGALORE-566 086. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.HANUMANTHAPPA & SRI. RAGHUNATH.C.M., ADVOCATES [ABSENT]) AND: 1. ANDHRA BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER, GANDHINAGAR BRANCH, BANGALORE-566 009. SUBSTITUTING ASSIGNEE OF ANDHRA BANK OMKARA ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, REGISTERED AS SECURIZATION AND ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PURSUANT TO SECTION OF SARFEASI ACT, REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.9, M.P.NAGAR, 1ST STREET, KONGU NAGAR EXTENSION, TIRUPUR-641 607. TAMIL NADU. 2. AXIS BANK NO.22/1223/A-1, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:648 WP No. 15178 of 2015 GROUND & FIRST FLOOR, GT ROAD, NEAR RTC DEPT, NELLORE-524 003. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. 3. REGIONAL DIRECTOR FOR ANDHRA PRADESH, RERSEREVE BANK OF INDIA, 6-1-56, SECRETARIAT ROAD, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD-500 004. 4. SURYA CONSTRUCTIONS, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, D. MALLIKARJUNA REDDY, S/O SUNDARAMAI REDDY, NO.25/2/475, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, NIPPU CENTRE, MARAGADARSI CHIT FUNDS (UPSTAIRS), VEDAYAPALEM NELLORE-524 001. ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. M/S. SHREE SURYA CONSTRUCTIONS, (SURYACON), IN ASSOCIATION WITH M/S.KHURANA ENGINEERING LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY MSK-SURYAKANTH (JV), REPRESENTED BY ITS GPA HOLDER, S/O SUNDARAMAI REDDY, NO.25/2/475, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, NIPPU CENTRE, MARAGADARSI CHIT FUNDS (UPSTAIRS), VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE-524 001. ANDHRA PRADESH. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SINDHU.V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SIVARAMAKRISHNA.M.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. GANESH BHAT.Y.H., ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. ZULFIKIR KUMAR SHAFI., ADVOCATE FOR R4; R3 & 5 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:648 WP No. 15178 of 2015 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. A perusal of the petition papers reveals that the petition is filed in the year 2015. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending for almost ten years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33.1