IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.968 of 2025 Decided on: 28th February, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Savita …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge The petition is bereft of material pleadings. Even the grounds, on the basis of which relief has been claimed, have not been elaborated. 2. Confronted with above, learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua February 28, 2025 Judge Mukesh