Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24555 (AP)

P.Gopal v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/16079/2018 · 2025-03-11

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010347812018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16079/2018 Between: P.GOPAL, OCC- UNEMPLOYED, R/O BC COLONY, KAMBADUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. THE AP SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CO LTD, CORPORATE OFFICE, DOOR NO.19-13-65/A, SREENIVASAPURAM, TIRUCHANOOR, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. THE ANDHRA PRADESH TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD, REP. BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDHYUTH SOUDHA, GUNADALA, ELURU ROAD, VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, AP SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD, ANANTAPUR 5. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, AP SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD, KALYANADURGAM DIVISION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 2. V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL) 3. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 4. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: The docket proceedings dated 07.03.2025 would show that the learned counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 5 submitted that, in obedience to the interim order dated 01.05.2018 passed by this Court, the representation of the Petitioner dated 19.08.2018 was considered by the Department and passed orders dated 21.06.2018 rejecting the claim of the Petitioner. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner. There was no representation for the Petitioner on 07.03.2025 also. 4. In that view, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:11.03.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16079 of 2018 Dt.11.03.2025 Dinesh