1 2025:CGHC:13912 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3399 of 2021 • Rohit Kumar Sahu S/o Manrakhanlal Sahu Aged About 58 Years Working As Society Incharge , Prathmik Krishi Sakh Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Bitkule , District Balod Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department Of Cooperative, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya , Atal Nagar , Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Chief Executive Officer Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit , Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3. Managing Director Chhattisghar Markfed , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4. Jila Vipnan Adhikari Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipnan Sangh, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None. For State : Ms. Neelima Singh Thakur, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate For Respondents No. 3 & 4 : Mr. Chetan Singh Chouhan, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Ashish Surana, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 22. 03.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition against notice issued by the Chief Executive Officer, District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Raipur dated 03.12.2020 whereby the petitioner has been held liable for deficiency of paddy of 154.80 quintal amounting to Rs. 281107.80/-. The petitioner SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.03.24 17:36:37 +0530 2 challenged the said notice by filing instant petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner has efficacious alternative remedy to challenge that order by raising a dispute under Section 64 of the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act. 3. Heard. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that the writ petition is filed against the Cooperative Society and there is efficacious alternative remedy, in my opinion, this petition is not maintainable and accordingly, same is hereby dismissed. 5. The petitioner would be at liberty to avail the remedy available under the law. 6. In view of the above, interim order dated 31.08.2021 is hereby vacated. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant