Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24544 (AP)

V. Prasad, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/17340/2025 · 2025-07-08

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010346642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) | 0f WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17340 OF 2025 Between: 1. V. Prasad,, S/o Late V Munirathnam , Aged about 45, Occupation CEO/Chairman, R/o Flat No. 28 bommasandra industrial Opposite to Times of lndia,Beside ICICI Bank Bangalore 560099 2. WR Sony,, D/o W R Rajendranath Rao, Aged about 42, Occupation Director/Manager, R/o Flat No. 28 Bommasandra Industrial Estate Opposite to Times of India,Beside ICICI Bank estate Bangalore 560099 ...Petitioners AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department, Secretariat, Amaravati 2. The commissioner of Police, Tirupathi Commissionerate District 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Tirupathi West PS Chittoor District 4. The S H O, Tirupathi West PS Chittoor District 5. Devathi Chakrapani, S/o Late D. Sheshafh, aged 42 years, R/o Door No. 20-1-295/A, Maruthi Nagar, Korlagunta District 6. Anil, Sub Inspector of Police Tirupathi West PS Chittoor C 7. Ravi, Police Constable Tirupathi West PS Chittoor District 8. Charan, Police Constable Tirupathi West PS Chittoor District to Home . Chittoor Tirupati Town, Tirupati District ...Respondents praying that in the the High Court may be Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the Writ of Mandamus, declaring the high-handed, arbitrary and malafidy action of the respondents in harassing the petitioner in repayment of the amount to the Respondent no. 5 in connection with the offences Cr No..85 of 2025 Tirupathi West PS on 19-06-2025 contrary to law, is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Art. 19(1 )(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners and his family members by calling to the police stations and searching the house in any mode in connection with the offences Cr No..85 of 2025 Tirupathi West PS on 19-06-2025 in the interest of justice. nature of lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners and his family members by calling to the police stations and nor searching the house in any mode in connection with the offences Cr No.85 of 2025 Tirupathi West PS on 19-06- 2025 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S S LAKSHMI PRAMEELA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010346642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [345|] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17340/2025 Between: 1.V. PRASAD,, S/0 LATE V MUNIRATHNAM , AGED ABOUT 45, OCCUPATION CEO/CHAIRMAN,R/0 FLAT NO. 28 BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE OPPOSITE TO TIMES OF INDIA,BESIDE ICICI BANK BANGALORE 560099 r 2.WR SONY,, D/0 W R RAJENDRANATH RAO, AGED ABOUT 42, OCCUPATION DIRECTOR/MANAGER, R/0 FLAT NO. 28 BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE OPPOSITE TO TIMES OF INDIA,BESIDE ICICI BANK BANGALORE 560099 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI COMMISSIONERATE CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI WEST PS CHITTOOR DISTRICT f 4.THES H O, TIRUPATHI WEST PS CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5.DEVATHI CHAKRAPANI, S/0 LATE D. SHESHATH, AGED 42 YEARS, R/0 DOOR NO. 20-1-295/A, MARUTHI NAGAR, KORLAGUNTA, TIRUPATI TOWN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ^ ■ 6.ANIL, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DISTRICT 7. RAVI, POLICE CONSTABLE TIRUPATHI WEST PS CHITTOOR DISTRICT 8.CHAIRAN, POLICE CONSTABLE TIRUPATHI WEST PS CHITTOOR DISTRICT WEST PS i ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the high-handed, arbitrary and malafidy action of the respondents in harassing the petitioner in repayment of the amount to the Respondent no. 5 in connection with the offences Cr No 85 of 2025 Tirupathi West PS on 19-06-2025 contrary to law, is illegal, arbitrary ahd violative of Art. 19(1 )(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently consequently direct the respondents not to harass petitioners and his family members by calling to the police stations searching the house in any mode in connection with the offences Cr No 85 of 2025 Tirupathi West PS on 19-06-2025 in the interest; of justice the and lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners and his family members by calling to the police stations and nor searching the house in any mode in connection with the offences Cr No.85 of 2025 Tirupathi West PS 19-06- 2025 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S): i 1.S LAKSHMI PRAMEELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ' on .'H THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N > / WRIT PETITION No.1734Q OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are aggrieved by the repeated interference of the police in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the 5‘^ respondent and at tlie behest of 5*^ respondent, the respondents 4, 6 to 8 are constantly troubling the petitioners and pressurizing the petitioners to settle the disputes with the 5**^ respondent. 2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the State. 3. Considering the spbrnissions, the respondents 3, 4, 6 to 8 are hereby directed not to interfere with the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the 5*^ respondent, without following the due process of law. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed off. No costs^ 4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/- U.SRi DEVI ASSISTANT REEGtSTRAR //TRUE COPY// ' SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Pradesh, Secretariat,Amaravati 2. The commissioner of Police, Tirupathi Commissionerate District 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Tirupathi West PS Chittoor District Home Department, State of Andhra Chittoor 4. The S H O, Tirupathi West PS Chittoor District 5. One CC to M/s S Lakshmi Prameela Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:09/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 17340 OF 2025 disposing the WP WITHOUT COSTS