APHC010346552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3541] MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17295/2025 Between: 1. BATTULA SAMBAIAH, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. 5-96/A, REVENDRAPADU, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI RURAL POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. BATTULA MAHESH, , S/O. SAMBAIAH, AGED 22 YEARS, R/O. 5-96/A REVENDRAPADU, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. MERIGA PRAVEEN, S/O. PREMAIAH, AGED 22 YEARS, R/O. 5-118, ATMAKUR VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus Email or any other Writ, order or direction directing the respondents to produce my son i.e., Battula Mahesh, S/o. Sambaiah, aged 22 years, R/o. 5- 96/a, Revendrapadu, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh before this Honble Court and for such consequential direction as deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to produce the CCTV footage of the respondent No.4 police station, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenues have been set at liberty, after the filing of the present Writ Petition and that no further orders are required to be passed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ____________________ SUMATHI JAGADAM, J Date: 14.07.2025 MJA 26 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17295 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 14.07.2025 MJA