Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2454 (AP)

BALA VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA v. VEGUNTA KRISHNA MOHAN

AS/53/2020 · 2025-07-17

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.53 OF 2020) APHC010002502020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 53/2020 Between: 1. BALA VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. BUCHAIAH, HINDU, MALE, AGED 59 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O MUDICHERLA VILLEGE, LINGAPALEM MANDALAM, W.G.DT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. VEGUNTA KRISHNA MOHAN, S/O LATE MADHUSUDHANA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED 66 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.22C-11-43, CHUNDURU VARI VEEDHI, POWERPET, ELURU, W.G.DT. 2. VEGUNTA MADANA MOHAN, S/O LATE MADHUSUDHANA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED 61 YEARS, BUSINESS AND EMPLOYEE, R/O. C/O. KOLLI JNANA PRASAD, D.NO.4-83, NAGA DEVATHA TEMPLE STREET, SATRAMPADU, ELURU MANDAL, W.G.DT. ...RESPONDENT(S): to set-aside judgement and decree Dt. 31.10.2019 (Thirty First day of October Two Thousand Nineteen) and passed in O.S.No. 113/2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Principal District Judges' Court, W.G, Eluru dismissing the suit and allow this appeal by decreeing the suit with costs althrough and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.53 OF 2020) pleased to grant stay of operation of Decree and Judgement Dt. 31.10.2019 (Thirty First Day of October Two Thousand and Nineteen) and passed in O.S.No. 113/2015 on the file of Principal District Judges' Court, W.G., Eluru as far as directing the Petitioner/Appellant/Plaintiff to pay to the respondents/defendants a sum of Rs. 89,281/- towards costs of the suit pending disposal of the above appeal in the ends of justice end pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. C VENKAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.53 OF 2020) The Court made the following: JUDGMENT :- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) Sri Chalasani Venkaiah, learned counsel for the appellant, has submitted a memo dated 08.07.2025, stating that the parties have compromised and settled the matter out of court. Hence, no cause of action survives in the appeal, and he prays for dismissal of the same as not pressed. 2. Recording the same, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date : 18.07.2025. RPD. (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.53 OF 2020) 96 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED) APPEAL SUIT NO: 53 of 2020 Date: 18.07.2025 RPD.