Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24538 (KAR)

SRI T KRISHNEGOWDA v. SMT BHAGYAMMA

RFA/1828/2019 · 2025-01-21

K Somashekar, Venkatesh Naik T

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2524-DB RFA No. 1828 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1828 OF 2019 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI T KRISHNEGOWDA S/O D. THIMMAIAH @ NARAYANSWAMY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.114, M.S. NO.648 NEW NO. 135/4 NGEF LAYOUT, 5TH CROSS 5TH MAIN, SANJAYANAGAR BENGALURU 560094. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. REVANASIDDAPPA H. K. - ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O RAMAKRISHNA D/O LATE VARALAKSHMI @ VARALAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 2. SMT. ARASI NAGARAJU W/O NAGARAJU D/O LATE VARALAKSHMI @ VARALAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 3. SRI. KIRAN @ YOGESH S/O RAMAKRISHNA AND SMT. BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2524-DB RFA No. 1828 of 2019 ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.114, M.S. NO.648 NEW NO.135/4, NGEF LAYOUT 5TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN SANJAYNAGAR, BENGALURU 560094. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANDRAIAH AND SRI. PARAMASHIVAIAH – ADVOCATES FOR RESPONDENTS NO.1 & 3; SRI T SATEESHA – ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2 ) THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/AT ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN O.S.NO.4769/2012 DATED 14.06.2019 ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE XLII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY AND DISMISS THE SAID SUIT. THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR) Learned counsel Shri Revanasiddappa H.K. for the appellant has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the appeal stating that the matter has been settled out of Court. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2524-DB RFA No. 1828 of 2019 2. The memo filed by the learned counsel is taken on record and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. I.A.No.1/2024 stands disposed of as a consequence. SD/- (K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE SD/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE KS