Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24533 (RAJ)

JAMEELA v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/10548/2016 · 2025-05-09

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10548/2016 Jameela D/o Late Chhiddu, R/o Rathor Colony, Ji Road, Dholpur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Tehsildar, Tehsil Dholpur, Raj. 2. Shamsuddin S/o Late sh. Chhiddu r/o Mahalla Bajadia Kothhi, Dholpur, Raj. 3. Bhura S/o Late sh. Chhiddu r/o Mahalla Bajadia Kothhi, Dholpur, Raj. 4. Noora S/o Late sh. Chhiddu r/o Mahalla Bajadia Kothhi, Dholpur, Raj. 5. Bisso D/o Late sh. Chhiddu r/o Mahalla Bajadia Kothhi, Dholpur, Raj. 6. Hasso D/o Late sh. Chhiddu, R/o Mohalla Malakpada, Town Bdi, Tehsil Badi, Dholpur. 7. Hakko s/o Shyama, R/o Mohalla Malakpada, Town Bdi, Tehsil Badi, Dholpur. 8. Ayub s/o sh. Shyama, R/o Mohalla Malakpada, Town Bdi, Tehsil Badi, Dholpur. 9. Ahsan s/o sh. Shyama, R/o Mohalla Malakpada, Town Bdi, Tehsil Badi, Dholpur. 10.Laxmibai w/o Sh. Mittahan Baghela, r/o Mohalla Daampur, Dist. Dholpur, Raj,. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Utkarsh Goyal Ms. Gunjan Chawla Ms. Priyamwada Singh Mr. Harshit Parshar and Mr. P.L.Bairwa for Mr. Neeraj Batra- G.C. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/05/2025 (2 of 2) [CW-10548/2016] Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition, the parties have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise, hence he does not want to prosecute this petition any further. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/48