Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24533 (JHR)

ASHISH KUMAR ALIAS ASHISH SAW ALIAS PAKORI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8373/2025 · 2025-09-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:30157 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8373 of 2025 ------ Ashish Kumar @ Ashish Saw @ Pakori, aged about 31 years, son of Arjun Saw, resident of Vill-Balgadda, P.O. & P.S.- Simariya, Dist.-Chatra (Jharkhand) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. H.K. Shikarwar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 25.09.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Gola P.S. Case No.132 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 109/308(4)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 25 (1-a)/27 of Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder of the employee of PRA India Pvt. Ltd. company on 27.12.2024. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and on the alleged date and time of occurrence, the petitioner was in custody in Ramgarh Jail in connection with another case. It is also submitted that the petitioner has not been put to T.I. Parade in connection with this case and no injury has been sustained by anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.04.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 07 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 21.08.2025 in B.A. No.7158 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be also admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Ramgarh, in connection with Gola P.S. Case No.132 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 25.09.2025 Sonu/Gunjan-