Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2453 (HP)

ANIL THAKUR AND ORS v. ASHISH KOHLI

COPC/1281/2025 · 2026-01-02

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1281 of 2025 Decided on: 2nd January, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anil Thakur and others …..Petitioners Versus Sh. Ashish Kohli .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Following order was passed in this matter on 08.12.2025:- “Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of order dated 06.12.2025 from the Director School Education, Himachal Pradesh, conveying that decision in CWP No.4830 of 2023 (Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.), decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025, on the basis of which the respondents were directed to consider the cases of the petitioners in the judgment dated 20.06.2025, has not yet attained finality. It is for the respondent to implement the judgment in case there is no stay against the decision. 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 Compliance affidavit/reply be filed within two weeks. List thereafter.” 2. Pursuant to above order, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of office order dated 01.01.2026 passed in the case of the petitioners. Taking note of above document, the present contempt proceedings are closed with hope & trust that benefits flowing to the petitioners, if any, under the aforesaid office order shall be released in their favour within six weeks from today. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 02, 2026 Judge Mukesh