Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2453 (AP)

Sri. Ramayanam Rupesh, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/661/2025 · 2025-01-09

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAl WRIT PETITION NO: 661 OF 2025 Between: Sri. Ramayanam Rupesh, son of R. Muddu Krishnaiah aged about 44 years, Residing at D.No.8-13, Prakasham and Gandhi Veedhi (Kaikala Street), Srikalahasthi Town, Post and Mandal, Tirupati district. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Building, Velgapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Joint Collector, Tirupati District. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Tirupati District. 4. The Tahsildar, Srikalahasthi Mandal Tirupati District. 5. P. Bharathi, w/o P. Kiran Kumar, D/o Late R. Subramanyam R/o. D.No.13-192, Shram Nagar, Puttur, town post and Mandal, Tirupati District. 6. Smt Ramisetty Ademma, w/o Late R. Subramanyam, aged about 65 years. Household. 7. Ramisetty Venkatapathi, S/o. Late R. Subramanyam, aged about 39 years, Occ - Agriculture, ( Respondents 7 and 8 are R/o. Thorur village, Puttur Mandal Tirupati District). % 8. C. Bujjamma, W/o. C. Srihari, D/o Late R. Subramanyam aged about 35 years, Household, R/o. D.No.9-108,G.N.Kandriga Village, Aranyam Kandriga Post, Narayanavanam Mandal Tirupati District, 9. Smt. S.K. Asma Begum, W/o. Shaik Akbar Basha, Prakasam and Gandhi Veedhi, (Kaikala Street), Srikalahasthi Town, Post and Mandal, Tirupati District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent herein in not numbering and passing any orders on the stay application which is filed along with the Revision petition vide Revision Petition No. 217/2024, which is filed as against the orders passed by the 3rd respondent herein dated 09- 10-2024 in appeal vide Case No. D.Dis.(D2)/150/2024 filed by the 5th respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to the established principles of law and consequently direct the 2nd respondent herein to dispose of the revision filed by this petitioner immediately forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance to the orders dated 09- 10-2024 passed by the 3rd respondent herein in appeal vide Case No. D.Dis.(D2)/150/2024 pending disposal of the present writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. K PALLAVI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010002552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA ' PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 661/2025 Between: 1.SRI. RAMAYANAM RUPESH,, SON OF R. MUDDU KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.8-13, PRAKASHAM AND GANDHI VEEDHI (KAIKALA STREET), SRIKALAHASTHI TOWN, POST AND MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETRARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELGAPUDl, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE JOINT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4.THETAHSILDAR, SRIKALAHASTHI MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5.P BHARATHI, W/0 P. KIRAN KUMAR, D/0 LATE R. SUBRAMANYAM R/0. D.NO.13-192, SHRAM NAGAR, PUTTUR, TOWN POST AND MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6.SMT RAMISETTY ADEMMA, W/0 LATE R. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. HOUSEHOLD. 7.RAMISETTY VENKATAPATHI, S/0. LATE R. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC - AGRICULTURE, ( RESPONDENTS 7 AND 8 ARE R/0. THORUR VILLAGE, PUTTUR MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT). 8.C BUJJAMMA, W/0. C. SRIHARI, D/0 LATE R. SUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD, R/0. D.N0.9- f- 2 & 108„G.N.KANDRIGA VILLAGE, ARANYAM KANDRIGA POST, NARAYANAVANAM MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT, 9.SMT S K ASMA BEGUM, W/0. SHAIK AKBAR BASRA, PRAKASAM AND GANDHI VEEDHI, (KAIKALA STREET), SRIKALAHASTHI TOWN, POST AND MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S); Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KPALLAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Smt. K. Pallavi, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri K. Arjun Chowdhary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that the Writ Petitioner has filed Revision Petition bearing R.P.No.217/2024 on 26.10.2024 along with an Interlocutory Application seeking stay of the impugned Order therein dated 09.10.2024 passed by the District Revenue Officer (Respondent No.3) in Case No.D.Dis.No.(D2)/150/2024. Learned Counsel would submit that the Interlocutory Application seeking stay which is filed along with the Revision Petition bearing R.P.No.217/2024 has not been numbered by the Joint Collector, Tirupati (Respondent No.2). 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition, at the admission stage, without going into the merit, directing the Joint Collector (Respondent No.2) to number the Interlocutory Application seeking stay, if it is not already numbered, within a period of 2 weeks from today and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law by passing a Speaking Order within a 3. 3 period of four weeks after the said Interlocutory Application is numbered and communicate a copy of such Order to the Writ Petitioner forthwith. Needless to state that the Respondent No.2 is statutorily obligated to 4. adhere to the principles of Natural Justice by issuing advance Notice to the other interested parties, consider their Writ Petitioner and any submissions/objections and documents, if any, before issuing the final order. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of this Order to Respondent No.2 within one week from today, for effective compliance. 5. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. 6. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Building, Velgapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Joint Collector, Tirupati District. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Tirupati District. 4. The Tahsildar, Srikalahasthi Mandal Tirupati District. 5. One CC to Smt. K Pallavi Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies GSC y I* HIGH COURT DATED:09/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.661 of 2025 X 2 2 JAN 202^ ^ Currem Seciion ^ DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS