APHC010003112003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22656/2003 Between: 1. K.KANAKA DURGA, W/O. SATYASAIBABA, ANM R/O KONDAYYAPALEM, KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHAIRMAN INDIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT & DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL HEALTH OFFICER, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE PROJECT COORDINATOR OF URBAN HEALTH, CENTRE AND HON'BLE SECRETARY TO INDIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to provide the Petitioner a reasonable opportunity to defend her case on the baseless allegations made against her and to immediately reinstate her as ANM by setting aside the impugned order of the 3rd Respondent and declare the action of 3rd Respondent in not providing her reasonable opportunity to defend my case and consequently terminating her from the post of ANM as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice etc and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 28346 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to reinstate her services forthwith as ANM in UHC, Sanjayanagar, Kakinada pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V ANANTHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR