1 2025:CGHC:4432 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2096 of 2019  Sarvamangla Buildcon Through Partner Vimal Agrawal S/o Shri Ramsingh Agrawal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 107 Transport Nagar, Tahsil And Police Station Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 4. The Collector Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 5. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Office Of Director Town And Country Planning, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 6. Municipal Corporation Korba Through Municipal Commissioner, Korba, Head Office Saket Bhawan Korba, Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None. For State : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24. 01.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition against the notice dated 25.04.2019, 2 whereby, he was directed to renew his building permission as earlier permission granted by the Municipal Corporation, Korba got lapsed. 2. Mr. P. Acharya, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 6/Municipal Corporation, would submit that after the filing of the present petition, the petitioner filed two more petitions bearing WPC No. 2989 of 2019 and WPC No. 624 of 2020, claiming a similar relief for the same plot. He would further submit that the petitioner may approach the Municipal Corporation for the redressal of his grievances. 3. Mr. Pramod Ramteke, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State would endorse the submissions made by Mr. Acharya. 4. Taking into consideration the above-discussed facts, the instant petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to approach the Municipal Corporation for the redressal of his grievance(s), if the cause of action still subsists. 5. With the aforesaid observation(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant