1 2025:CGHC:22502 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4009 of 2025 1. Mohammad Shahbaz S/o Mohammad Siraj Aged About 31 Years R/o 211, R.D.A., Plot Near Samudayak Bhawan, Ward No. 54, Sanjay Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Deepesh Kumar Bhatpahari S/o Mannu Lal Bhatpahari Aged About 33 Years R/o 1793, Chaurasiya Colony, Santoshi Nagar, Mathpurena, Sunder Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Neeraj Gayakwad S/o Patiran Aged About 33 Years R/o Sarakhi, Abhanpur, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4. Sanjay Kumar Sahu S/o Ashwan Sahu Aged About 36 Years R/o House No. 23, School Para, Village Radhwani, Sureli, Raurwahi, Kanker, District Kanker Chhattisgarh 5. Rupesh Sonpuri S/o Santosh Sonpuri Aged About 40 Years R/o Govindpur, Kanker, District Kanker Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Chief Secretary Chhattisgarh State Government. Mahanad Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Secretary Law And Legislative Affairs Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4. Secretary General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5. Secretary Finance Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.06.05 18:33:14 +0530 2 6. Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sector 19, Capital Complex,nava Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh 7. Superintendent Engineer Public Works Department, Bridge Construction, Division Raipur, Sirpur Bhawan, Behind Akashvani, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 05.06.2025 1. Heard Mr. Pravesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Vinay Pandey, learned Dy. Advocate General, appearing for the respondents/State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file a better constituted petition. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Manish