DALURAM MEENA S/O RAMKHILADI MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/227/2025 · 2025-01-10
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2451 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2451 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1733] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 227/2025 Daluram Meena S/o Ramkhiladi Meena, R/o Village Thekda, Tehsil Mahuwa, District Dausa. Presently Sub Inspector (Under Trainee), Rpa, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Shandilya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 10/01/2025
1. Instant application for bail is preferred by petitioner-Daluram Meena S/o Ramkhiladi Meena in a matter arising out of FIR No. 02/2024 registered at P.S. SOG, Jaipur for offence under Sectiosn 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC and 3, 4 and 6 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act
1992.
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that maximum punishment Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act 1992 is three years and petitioner is in custody for one year. He further submitted that after filing of charge-sheet still there is no likelihood of commencement of trial. He further submitted that the allegation of present petitioner is not appearing in the examination and engaging another person to appear on behalf of petitioner. At last, he submitted that petitioner is sole
[2025:RJ-JP:1733] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-227/2025] bread-earner and disposal of criminal case will take its own time which is triable by Magistrate. 3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. He has submitted report received from ATS, SOG Jaipur. 4. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Initially first application of present petitioner was dismissed on 25.06.2024 on the ground that the allegation of present petitioner was using unfair means in recruitment process of police personnel. The investigation is complete and petitioner is in custody since 02.02.2024. The charge-sheet has already been filed before the concerned Magistrate Court. The allegation on present petitioner instead of person appearing in competitive examination appearing through a dummy candidate. 6. At this stage, it is not possible for us to express any opinion on merits of the case but looking to the fact that petitioner is in custody for nearly one year and disposal of criminal case will take its own time, therefore it is appropriate to release petitioner on bail. 7. hus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Daluram Meena S/o Ramkhiladi Meena is hereby allowed and the applicant-accusedDaluram Meena S/o Ramkhiladi Meena is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of ₹25,000/- to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:-
[2025:RJ-JP:1733] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-227/2025] (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 8.
The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /01