2025:JHHC:13668 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6184 of 2024 ------ Pradeep Kumar Jha @ Pradeep Jha, son of Nawal Kishor Jha, resident of village Gumma, PO Motiya, PS Motiya OP, District Godda … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Mairun Nisha, wife of Karim Ansari, resident of village Lobandha, PO and PS Godda (Muffasil), District Godda … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P. ----- 07/ 06.05.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Complaint Case No. 535 of 2023 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. This case arises out of complaint. The allegation against the petitioner is that he got the account of the complainant opened and thereafter taken the money from the same. It is alleged that the complainant did not knew that loan was taken from his account in the year 2019. Only when the notice of default came to him he could know about this act. 2025:JHHC:13668 2 5. Since the case arises of compliant there is no question of custodial investigation. Further cognizance has already been taken and summons have been issued. 6. In view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar” reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 and “Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and Anr.” reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51, I direct the petitioner to appear before the trial Court since there is no question of arrest in this case and take appropriate steps. 7. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3