Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24503 (ALL)

ASHUTOSH KUMAR PANDEY v. CHIEF MANAGER BRANCH BANK OF BARODA AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/6654/2025 · 2025-09-15

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 6654 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ghanshyam Chaubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Archana Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition inter alia with the following prayer:- "(a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of the mandamus commanding and directing to the respondent No. 3 to punish the respondent no. 2 for illegal stippled the dairy loan of the borrower. (b) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondent No. 2 to compensate the damage of the dairy of the petitioner (borrower)." 3. Though a writ of mandamus has been sought for by the petitioner, it is admitted that before approaching this Court at no point of time any representation has been made by the petitioner before the authorities. 4. Law in this connection is well settled that before approaching this Court in a writ of mandamus, the parties should approach before the authorities and only, thereafter, such kind of writ petitions are maintainable. 5. From the perusal of record, it is clear that at no point of time any request has been made by the petitioner before the authorities before approaching this Court. 6. In this view of the matter, the Court is of the opinion that the present writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Ghanshyam Chaubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Archana Singh, Anadi Krishna Narayana Ashutosh Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Chief Manager Branch Bank Of Baroda And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) petition filed by the petitioner is not maintainable 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. 8. It is made clear that this order will not restrained the petitioner to approach the authorities raising his grievances as has been raised by him in the present writ petition. (Prakash Padia,J.) September 16, 2025 Arti WRIC No. 6654 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad