NITIN KUMAR NAGRAJ ALIAS CHHOTU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./3071/2019 · 2025-05-06
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24496 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24496 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:13585 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 3071 of 2019
------
1. Prakash Chandra Modi, aged about 63 years, son of late Baldeo Modi
2. Nitin Nagraj @ Chhotu @ Nitin Kumar Nagraj, aged about 21 years, son of Sri Prakash Chandra Modi Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are residents of Village-Ganoul, P.O.- Narayanpur, P.S.-Bhawanipur (Bihpur), Dist.-Bhagalpur (Bihar)
3. Pankaj Kumar, aged about 39 years, son of Sri Upendra Prasad, resident of Kanti Factory Road, Kankarbagh, P.O.- Lohia Nagar, P.S.-Patrakar Nagar, Dist.-Patna (Bihar)
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Pramila Devi, wife of Sir Nageshwar Tiwary, resident of Vajpai Path, Shukla Colony, Hinoo, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, Dist.-Ranchi (Jharkhand), PIN-834002
.... .... .... Opp. Parties
------
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Suraj D. Munda, Addl. P.P.
For O.P. No.2
: Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocate
------
Order No.05 Dated- 06.05.2025 I.A. No.4443 of 2025
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer to delete the name of the petitioner no.1-Prakash Chandra Modi who died on 02.02.2025 and in this respect, learned counsel for the petitioners draw the attention of this Court to the photocopy of the death certificate of Prakash Chandra Modi.
Considering the aforesaid facts, the prayer is allowed.
Registry is directed to delete the name of the petitioner no.1 with red ink and renumber the other petitioners as petitioner nos.1 and 2 respectively.
This interlocutory application is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Cr.M.P. No. 3071 of 2019
Heard the parties.
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to raise the grounds mentioned in the petition at appropriate stage before the appropriate court.
This criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
In view of the withdrawal of this criminal miscellaneous petition, interlocutory application, if any, is disposed of being infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-