ABDUL MOJIB ALLIAS MD ABDUL MOJIB v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8273/2025 · 2025-09-12
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24495 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24495 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:27935 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8273 of 2025
------ Md. Abdul Mojib @ Abdul Mojib, aged about 30 years, son of Abdul Hamid, resident of village Samalpur, P.O and P.S. Patharda, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioner
-Versus - The State of Jharkhand
... … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P.
------ 02/12.09.2025
Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Simdega P.S. Case No. 91 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 224 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega.
3. Bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court vide B.A. No. 10623/2024 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months.
4. On 20.04.2024, the Informant Rajendra Baraik received a call on his mobile from mobile no. 7645875414. The caller introduced himself as an employee posted in the office of Chief Minister. He informed him that under the scheme of Government for drought area, a tractor will be allotted to him. The caller asked him to deposit Rs. 35,000/- as the processing charge. The Informant deposited the said amount in the given account. The Informant deposited altogether Rs. 1,71,600/- in the different accounts on various dates. Later on, the Informant realized that he has become a victim of cyber fraud. Petitioner was identified as the caller.
5. It was submitted that petitioner is in custody since 09.08.2024.
6. Considering the period of custody, I am inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees
Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega in connection with Simdega P.S. Case No. 91 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 224 of 2024.
(Ambuj Nath, J.) Rahul/-