1 (WPS No. 3439 of 2017) 2025:CGHC:11118 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3439 of 2017 1 - Smt. Bharti Sharma W/o Late Shri Vinaydhar Sharma, Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Nagri, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Indrawati Bhawan, New Mantralay, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Commissioner, Raipur Division, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Nagri, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Nagri, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 7 - Block Education Officer, Tribal Block Nagri, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) For Petitioner :- Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate For State :- Mr. Pankaj Singh, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.6 :- Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Advocate SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 06.03.2025 1. Heard. ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.03.11 10:33:20 +0530 2 (WPS No. 3439 of 2017) 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made application for grant of compassionate appointment in place of her deceased husband, which has not been considered and decided by the Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Nagri, District – Dhamtari/ respondent No.6 till date. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.6/Jila Panchayat, Nagri, District - Dhamtari would submit that the decision on the application of the petitioner would be taken expeditiously. 4. Be that as it may, the Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Nagri, District- Dhamtari/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the application of the petitioner on its own merit strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within 45 days from the date of receipt of this order. Further, the petitioner is also at liberty to file additional representation along with relevant documents within three weeks from today before the respondent No.6/competent authority for redressal of her grievance. 5. With the aforesaid directions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!