Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24492 (KAR)

MR. K MUNIRAJ v. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED

WP/12072/2022 · 2025-06-30

Jyoti Mulimani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22843 WP No. 12072 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 12072 OF 2022 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: MR. K.MUNIRAJ S/O LATE M.KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.329, VEERABHADRA NILAYA, 3RD CROSS, KODIHALLI, AIRPORT ROAD, BANGALORE-560 057. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATARAMI REDDY.E., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, (BESCOM), REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, OFFICE AT NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, K.R.CIRLCE, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, BESCOM-E6, NO.2470, 2ND CROSS ROAD, HAL 2ND STAGE, KODIHALLI, BANGALORE-560 008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.V.DEVARAJU., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22843 WP No. 12072 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.H.V.Devaraju., counsel for the respondents has appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 12.04.2022 vide Annexure-A and consequently direct the second respondent to shift or relocate the existing live Electric RMV-1100 transformer situated on the drainage and footpath near sky walk, Kodihalli, Old Airport Road, Bangalore - 560 008 to any other safe place. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22843 WP No. 12072 of 2022 3. Counsel Sri.H.V.Devaraju., in presenting his arguments submits that a memo has been filed stating that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been considered by the BESCOM Authority and the same has been rejected and it is communicated to the petitioner. Counsel submits that he has furnished a true copy of the communication dated 22.12.2022 along with the memo. Counsel, therefore, submits that memo may be placed on record and an appropriate order may be passed. Submission is noted. Memo along with the true copy of communication dated 22.12.2022 is placed on record. 4. The petitioner's grievance is about the non- consideration of the representation. However, a perusal of the communication dated 22.12.2022 depicts that the authority has considered the representation submitted by the petitioner. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition as of today. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17