IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (118) CRM-M-9665-2022 Decided on : 10.07.2025 Parveen Kumar ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh and others ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Vij, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh. ***** Sumeet Goel (Oral): 1. Case has been called out twice. None has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Same was the position on 16.08.2023 as also on 09.07.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the U.T. Chandigarh has brought to the notice of this Court that challan qua FIR in question was presented on 25.05.2021 wherein total 16 prosecution witnesses have been cited and out of which 4 have been examined till date. The petitioner-accused is not even appearing before the trial Court. 3. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (SUMEET GOEL) July 10, 2025 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.07.10 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh