[2025:RJ-JP:30760] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6457/2025 Deepak S/o Mahendersingh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Matuki, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9112/2025 Sandeep S/o Kamal Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Matuki, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Chaudhary Ms. Pooja Dixit Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 08/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 75/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 132, 109(1) [2025:RJ-JP:30760] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6457/2025] and 310(2) of BNS and Sections 3 of Public Property Damage Prevention Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the injuries sustained to injured Mahendra Singh, Head Constable at his head was found to be simple sharp in nature. The injury sustained to other constable Jagan Singh was found to be simple blunt in nature. Prima facie offence under Section 109 of BNS is not made out against the petitioners. The charge-sheet has already been submitted against the accused- petitioners and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners are in custody since 22.04.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time. therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications and submitted the factual report. The same is taken on record. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 22.04.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: [2025:RJ-JP:30760] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6457/2025] 1. Deepak S/o Mahendersingh, 2. Sandeep S/o Kamal Singh, in connection with FIR No. 75/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /119-120