HORIL YADAV ALIAS BHUNESHWAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6364/2024 · 2025-03-24
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24477 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24477 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.6364 of 2024
------ Horil Yadav @ Bhuneshwar Yadav aged about- 53 years, son of Bhatu Mahto, resident of Village- Kapka, P.O.- Kapka, P.S.- Barkatha, District- Hazaribag (Jharkhand)
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Lalan Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl. P.P
------
Order No.06 Dated- 24-03-2025 I.A. No.3474 of 2025
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant anticipatory bail application.
Since, the hearing of instant anticipatory bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands disposed of being infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) A.B.A. No.6364 of 2024
Apprehending his arrest in connection with G (F) Case No.1239 of 2024 instituted under Sections 33/33 (F)/52 of the Indian Forest Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of a tractor which was seized by forest officials while being involved in illegal transportation of logs of wood from the forest area. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-08 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner had no knowledge about his vehicle being involved in any illegal activity. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag in connection with G (F) Case No.1239 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/