Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24476 (KAR)

MRS. JAYAMMA YELLAPPA v. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

WP/12555/2024 · 2025-07-01

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23308 WP No. 12555 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 12555 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. JAYAMMA YELLAPPA W/O RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 2. MR. R SHYAM SUNDAR S/O RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/AT SY.NO. 11, KHATHA NO. 161, 5TH CROS VIJAYANAGAR INFRONT OF AYYAPPA TEMPLE GANDHI NAGAR, WHITEFIELD BENGALURU 560 066 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LOKESHA D. S.,ADVOCATE) AND: CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA INDIRANAGAR BRANCH 853, 1ST FLOOR,10TH MAIN 4TH CROSS, INDIRANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU 560 038 REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. Y P GOKUL AND SRI ESHWAR N KOTI FOR C/R, ADVOCATES) Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23308 WP No. 12555 of 2024 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDERT ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE EVICTION NOTICE DTD. 20.04.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNX-B AND ORDER DTD. 02.03.2024 IN CRL. MISC. NO.360/2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IS PRODUCED AT ANNX-C IS ILLEGAL AND QUASH THE SAME. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as under:- MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioner has borrowed the money from respondent- Bank and paying regular EMI's upto filing of above writ petition. The respondent Bank regularize the N.P.Account, the same is paying towards balance EMI's. Hence, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the above writ petition in the interest of justice and equity. In the light of the same, the petition is dismissed as not pressed as it does not call for any adjudication. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE HR