Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010112692025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1747/2025 MISS PUJA BHUYAN AND 2 ORS D/O LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN (FATHER) AND LATE LUCKY MONI DAS (MOTHER) 2: MIS PANKHI BHUYAN D/O LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN (FATHER) AND LATE LUCKY MONI DAS (MOTHER) 3: MISS SUPRIYA BHUYAN D/O LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN (FATHER) AND LATE LUCKY MONI DAS (MOTHER) ALL ARE PERMANENT R/O VILL. UTTAR DULIA GAON TEOK P.O. UTTAR DULIA P.S. TEOK DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN 785112 PRESENT R/O TIPLING NAGAON JALONI GRANT 15 P.O. AND P.S. DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 78660 VERSUS INDU BHUYAN AND 2 ORS W/O LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN, 2:SANTANU BHUYAN Page No.# 2/4 S/O LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN (FATHER) AND SMTI. INDU BHUYAN (MOTHER) BOTH ARE PERMANENT R/O PUHARI KHANIA GAON RAJABHETA 135 F.S. MOHANAGHAT P.O. MOHANAGHAT P.S. BORBARUAH DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 786008 PRESENT RESIDING OF TIPLING NAGAON JALONI GRANT 15 P.O. AND P.S. DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 786602 3:BHASKAR JYOTI BHUYAN S/O LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN (FATHER) AND SANGITA BHUYAN (MOTHER) R/O VILL. TIPLING NAGAON P.O. DULIAJAN P.S. DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 78660 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A A R KARIM, S A KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : SCLP/0/0 MISS PUJA BHUYAN D/O LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN(FATHER) AND LATE LUCKY MONI DAS(MOTHER) 2: MISS PANKHI BHUYAN D/O LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN (FATHER) AND LATE LUCKY MONI DAS(MOTHER) 3: MISS SUPRIYA BHUYAN D/O LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN(FATHER) AND LATE LUCKY MONI DAS Page No.# 3/4 (MOTHER) RESIDENT OF VILLAGE UTTAR DULIA GAON TEOK JORHAT ASSAM VERSUS SMTI INDU BHUYAN WIFE OF LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN 2:SRI SANTANU BHUYAN SON OF LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN 3:SRI BHASKAR JYOTI BHUYAN SON OF LATE INDRESWAR BHUYAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TIPLING NAGAON DIBRUGARH ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : abul asad rezaul karim Advocate for : appearing for SMTI INDU BHUYAN BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 29.10.2025 1. Heard Mr. A. A. R. Karim the learned counsel for the applicants. 2. None has issued for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 in spite of due services on them, therefore, this Interlocutory Application is heard ex-parte against the said respondents. 3. This application under Section 115 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has been filed by the applicants praying for condoning the delay of 46 days in preferring the connected Intest Case. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant could not approach this Court within the prescribed period of limitation for the reasons mentioned in paragraph no. 4 of the application for condonation of Page No.# 4/4 delay 5. I have gone through the said reasons. 6. This Court is of the considered opinion that reasons stated in paragraph no. 4 of the aforesaid application may be regarded as sufficient cause, which prevented the applicant in approaching this Court by filing the Intest Case within the prescribed period of limitation. 7. Hence, the delay of 46 days in approaching this Court in filing the connected Intest Case is hereby condoned. 8. The Registry is directed to register the Intest Case and list the same for admission after a week on a date to be fixed by the Registry. 9. This Interlocutory Application is, accordingly, disposed of. . JUDGE Comparing Assistant