- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19631 WP No. 11736 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 11736 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHOBHA R. W/O SIDDARUDHA M.J., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 2. SRI.SIDDARUDHA M.J., S/O JOGI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/AT NO.5, 7TH CROSS, 10TH MAIN ROAD, JANANBHARATHI NAGAR, MALLATHAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 056. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHILPA RANI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19631 WP No. 11736 of 2025 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL RANGE, MILLERS ROAD, VASANTHNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 052 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA - 562 159 4. THE DY. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MAGADI DIVISION, TAVAREKERE, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 562 130 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAVAREKRE, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 562 130 6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAVAREKRE, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 562 130 … RESPONDENTS (BY MS. YASHODHA K.P., AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 - POLICE AUTHORITIES NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES AS THE DISPUTES INVOLVED IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES BETWEEN THE PETITIONERS AND OTHERS ARE PURELY CIVIL IN NATURE AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19631 WP No. 11736 of 2025 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Petitioner has sought for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to the Police Authorities restraining them from interfering with the rights of the petitioner insofar as the scheduled properties are concerned. 2. Petitioner draws the attention to the representation at Annexure-P. It is specifically stated that the police authorities are intervening and interfering with the rights of the petitioner. It is further asserted by the petitioner that the Superintendent of Police has made out a report to the Inspector General of Police at Annexure-E and accordingly, there is no warrant for the respondents to intervene. Learned AGA upon instructions submits that respondents would not intervene in the civil disputes unless there is any direction by the Court. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19631 WP No. 11736 of 2025 Taking note of such stand, petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP