DR TIKAM CHAND ACHARAYA v. STATE MEDICAL AND HEALTHORS
CW/14856/2015 · 2025-02-12
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24468 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24468 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:6195] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14856/2015 Dr. Tikam Chand Acharaya S/o Shri Raghunath Prasad Acharya, R/o A-7, Main Road, Jawahar Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary to the Government, Medical and Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Medical and Health Services, Government of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent, Shri Rajendra Public District Hospita, Government of Rajasthan, Jhalawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Prem Chand Sharma on behalf of Mr.H. V. Nandwana For Respondent(s) : Mr.Archit Bohra, Addl.GC.
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/02/2025
1. By way of filing of this petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to accept the application submitted by the petitioner for voluntary retirement.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said application of the petitioner was not accepted as a departmental enquiry under the Rajasthan Civil Services (classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short, "the Act of 1958") was pending against him and after completion of the enquiry, certain orders were passed against the petitioner and thereafter, the petitioner stood retired, after attaining the age of
[2025:RJ-JP:6195] (2 of 2) [CW-14856/2015] superannuation. Counsel submits that the retiral dues have been extended to the petitioner and the petitioner has not assailed the subsequent orders/ action of the respondents before this Court, hence, under the changed circumstances, this petition has become infructuous.
3. Considering the aforesaid factual aspect of the matter and the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /154