Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24463 (RAJ)

BHOOMI SINGH DAUGHTER OF SHRI RAM CHANDRA SINGH v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

CW/12594/2023 · 2025-02-06

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5319] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12594/2023 Bhoomi Singh Daughter Of Shri Ram Chandra Singh, Aged About 16 Years, Resident Of Flat No. 106, Vardhman Apartment, Devi Marg, Banipark, Jaipur (Raj.) Since Petitioner Is Minor Therefore, She Is Represented Through Her Father Namely Ram Chandra Singh, Who Is Her Natural Guardian Also. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Todarmal Marg, Ajmer (Raj.) Through Its Regional Officer. 2. St. Xaviers Senior Secondary School, Bhagwan Das Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Its Principal Fr. M. Arockiam, S.j. 3. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Shiksha Kendra 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi, Thorugh Its Chairperson. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahlad Sharma with Mr. Ram Prasad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav with Mr. Viswas Saini Mr. Ankit Kumar for Mr. Dinesh Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 06/02/2025 This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties:- “(i) The petitioner is at liberty to file a representation with the respondents within a period of four weeks from today seeking change [2025:RJ-JP:5319] (2 of 2) [CW-12594/2023] in date of her birth in the mark-sheet of secondary school examination. (ii) The respondents shall decide the same vide a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt taking into consideration the direction issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Jigya Yadav (Minor) (Through Guardian/Father Hari Singh) Versus C.B.S.E. (Central Board of Secondary Education) and Others: Civil Appeal No.3905/2011.” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/75