[2025:RJ-JP:30772] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9007/2025 1. Mein @ Muinuddin @ Lala S/o Sayeruddin, R/o Bagor, Moholla Dholikhar Karauli, Police Station Kotwali Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Karauli). 2. Rafiq @ Bhura S/o Sayeruddin, R/o Bagor, Moholla Dholikhar Karauli, Police Station Kotwali Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Karauli). 3. Shaukeen S/o Mein @ Muinuddin @ Lala, R/o Bagor, Moholla Dholikhar Karauli, Police Station Kotwali Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Karauli). 4. Zeeshan S/o Mein @ Muinuddin @ Lala, R/o Bagor, Moholla Dholikhar Karauli, Police Station Kotwali Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Karauli). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9008/2025 Suvhan S/o Rafiq @ Bhura, R/o Bagor, Moholla Dholikhar Karauli, Police Station Kotwali Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Krishana Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Rajneesh Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/08/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.127/2025 registered at Police Station Karauli, District Karauli for the offences under Sections 189(2), 126(2) & 115(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet [2025:RJ-JP:30772] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9007/2025] in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 117(2) & 109(1) of the BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that none of the injuries sustained by the injured has been opined as dangerous to life. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. It is submitted that petitioners are in custody since 08.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet, as also considering the fact that none of the injuries sustained by the injured has been opined as dangerous to life and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Mein @ Muinuddin @ Lala S/o Sayeruddin, (2) Rafiq @ Bhura S/o Sayeruddin, (3) Shaukeen S/o Mein @ Muinuddin @ Lala, (4) Zeeshan S/o [2025:RJ-JP:30772] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9007/2025] Mein @ Muinuddin @ Lala, and (5) Suvhan S/o Rafiq @ Bhura, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for the decision of these bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /238-239