« • APHC010345532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI t. THURSDAY. THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7143 OF 2025 Between: Avula Naresh, S/o.P.ama Rao, aged about 24 years, R/o.Konuru Village, Atchampeta Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Through Piduguralla P.S., Piduguralla, Palnadu District. 2. Jarupula Ranga Naik, S/o.Gangu Naik. 3. Yalagala Apparao, S/o.Kondaiah. 4. Rekha Naik, S/o. Balu Naik. 5. Yesupogu Raja, S/o.Deena Rao. 6. Thalia Siva Reddy, S/o.Venkata Kotireddy. 7. Avula Gurunadha, S/o.Venkaiah. 8. Kunisetty Vasu, S/o.Pullaah. Ar 9. Chimata Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Gopaiah. (Respondents 2 to 9 not necessary) ...Respondents Petition filed under Section 528 read with 457 of BNSS praying that in Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, execution of the circumstances stated in the (he High Court may be pleased to relax the condition that on (Twenty Lakhs) for release of vehicle vide in Crl.M.P.No.1401 of 2025 in Cr.No. 105 of personal bond of Rs.20,00,000 Orders dated 10-06-2025 made in _ of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Piduguralla, Guntur District. 2025 on the file Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G.V.S.Mehar Kumar Counsel for the Respondent N0.1 :Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi Assistant Public Prosecutor The Court made the follow ijiy APHC010345532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7143/2025 Between; 1.AVULA NARESH,, S/0. RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/0. KONURU VILLAGE, ATCHAMPETA MANUAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. THROUGH PIDUGURALLA P.S., PIDUGURALLA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 2.JARUPULA RANGA NAIK, S/0. GANGU NAIK 3.YALAGALA APPARAO, S/0. KONDAIAH 4.REKHA NAIK, S/0. BALU NAIK 5.YESUPOGU RAJA, S/0. DEENA RAO 6.THALIA SIVA REDDY, S/O.VENKATA KOTIREDDY 7.AVULA GURUNADHA, S/0. VENKAIAH 8.KUNISETTYVASU, S/0. PULLAAH 9.CHIMATA SRINIVASA RAO, S/0, GOPAIAH ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmaybe pleased to relax the condition that on execution of personal bond of Rs. 20,00,000 (Twenty Lakhs) for release of vehicle vide orders dt. 10/06/2025 made in CrI.M.P No. 1401/2025 in Cr. No. 105/2025 on the file of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Piduguralla in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.G VS MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S); 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 r/w 457 of BNSS has been filed, by the Petitioner, seeking relaxation of the condition that on execution of personal bond of Rs.25,00,000/- (Twenty-Five Lakhs) for release of vehicle vide orders dated 10.06.205 made in Crl.P.No.1401 of 2025 in Cr.No.105 of 2025, on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Piduguralla. At the time of hearing, Sri G.V.S.Mehar Kumar, learned counsel for the 2. Petitioner would submit that, this matter is squarely covered by the Order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Nagarapu Guru Anjaneyulu vs. State of A.P and others in Crl.P.No.7035 of 2025, dated 09.07.2025, wherein, it was held as follows: “5. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, this Court is inclined to modify the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.No.1403 of 2025. The petitioner is directed to furnish a personal bond for a sum of Rs.5 lakhs and also produce one surety for a like sum. The remaining conditions imposed by the learned Magistrate shall remain in force till the completion of the trial. Accordingly, the order stands modified. ” Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly 3. conceded that it is a covered order. Hence, in view of the Order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court 4. in Crl.P.No.7035 of 2025, dated 09.07.2025, and taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to modify the condition imposed in Crl.P.No.1401 of 2025 in Cr.No.105 of 2025, on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Piduguralla. The petitioner is directed to furnish a personal bond for a sum of Rs.5 lakhs and also produce one surety for a like sum. The remaining conditions imposed by the learned Magistrate shall remain in force till the completion of the trial. Accordingly, the order stands modified. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Pending applications, if shall stand closed. any. Sd/-B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Piduguralla, Guntur District. 2. The Station House Officer, Piduguralla Police Station, Guntur District. 3. One CC to Sri G.V.S.Mehar Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP at Amaravati [OUT] 4. A 5. Two CD Copies BSV vna \ ‘ HIGH COURT DATED:24/07/2025 ORDER CRLP NO. 7143 OF 2025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION